5 research outputs found

    Anomalous electron heating effects on the E region ionosphere in TIEGCM

    Full text link
    We have recently implemented a new module that includes both the anomalous electron heating and the electron‐neutral cooling rate correction associated with the Farley‐Buneman Instability (FBI) in the thermosphere‐ionosphere electrodynamics global circulation model (TIEGCM). This implementation provides, for the first time, a modeling capability to describe macroscopic effects of the FBI on the ionosphere and thermosphere in the context of a first‐principle, self‐consistent model. The added heating sources primarily operate between 100 and 130 km altitude, and their magnitudes often exceed auroral precipitation heating in the TIEGCM. The induced changes in E region electron temperature in the auroral oval and polar cap by the FBI are remarkable with a maximum Te approaching 2200 K. This is about 4 times larger than the TIEGCM run without FBI heating. This investigation demonstrates how researchers can add the important effects of the FBI to magnetosphere‐ionosphere‐thermosphere models and simulators.NNX14Al13G - NASA GCR; NASA LWS; NNX14AE06G; NNX15AB83G; NNX12AJ54G - NASA HGI; ACI-1053575 - National Science Foundatio

    Mesoscale phenomena and their contribution to the global response: a focus on the magnetotail transition region and magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling

    Get PDF
    An important question that is being increasingly studied across subdisciplines of Heliophysics is “how do mesoscale phenomena contribute to the global response of the system?” This review paper focuses on this question within two specific but interlinked regions in Near-Earth space: the magnetotail’s transition region to the inner magnetosphere and the ionosphere. There is a concerted effort within the Geospace Environment Modeling (GEM) community to understand the degree to which mesoscale transport in the magnetotail contributes to the global dynamics of magnetic flux transport and dipolarization, particle transport and injections contributing to the storm-time ring current development, and the substorm current wedge. Because the magnetosphere-ionosphere is a tightly coupled system, it is also important to understand how mesoscale transport in the magnetotail impacts auroral precipitation and the global ionospheric system response. Groups within the Coupling, Energetics and Dynamics of Atmospheric Regions Program (CEDAR) community have also been studying how the ionosphere-thermosphere responds to these mesoscale drivers. These specific open questions are part of a larger need to better characterize and quantify mesoscale “messengers” or “conduits” of information—magnetic flux, particle flux, current, and energy—which are key to understanding the global system. After reviewing recent progress and open questions, we suggest datasets that, if developed in the future, will help answer these questions

    Center for Geospace Storms: Transforming the Understanding and Predictability of Space Weather

    No full text
    Geospace is a system of systems comprised of interconnected physical domains: the magnetosphere, including all of its regions; the ionosphere; and the upper atmosphere in which the ionosphere is embedded. During geomagnetic storms, all of these domains become active and engage in complex, non-linear, cross-domain interactions that profoundly alter the entire system. Understanding and ultimately predicting these events requires modeling geospace as whole. At the same time, recent work has demonstrated the importance of cross-scale coupling in mediating the complex storm-time interactions, therefore requiring that such holistic models possess both sufficient resolving power and a representation of subgrid physics to capture the relevant processes across a broad range of scales. In this presentation, I will describe recent work on the development of such a high-resolution holistic model of the geospace system, the Multiscale Atmosphere-Geospace Environment (MAGE) model. MAGE is being developed by the Center for Geospace Storms (CGS), one of the three NASA DRIVE Science Centers that was recently selected for Phase II implementation. I will present the scientific objectives of the center, highlight some recent results from the MAGE model, and discuss ways in which the Center can promote synergies with MMS and other missions of the NASA HSO fleet

    Presentation2_The complexity of the day-side X-line during southward interplanetary magnetic field.ZIP

    No full text
    High-resolution global magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) simulations include both meso- and global-scale processes occurring at the magnetopause, which interact to determine the time-dependent orientation of the day-side x-line (DXL). This study demonstrates that the global orientation of the DXL in GAMERA global MHD simulations varies on a time scale of minutes during steady southward interplanetary magnetic field conditions. This behavior manifests in observational data when reconnection outflows indicate that the direction to the x-line is opposite to the prediction from a steady-state model of the reconnection location. Because steady-state models of the DXL do not capture dynamics that are independent of solar wind variations, particularly surface waves and flux transfer events, they represent a time-averaged state of the system. </p

    Presentation1_The complexity of the day-side X-line during southward interplanetary magnetic field.ZIP

    No full text
    High-resolution global magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) simulations include both meso- and global-scale processes occurring at the magnetopause, which interact to determine the time-dependent orientation of the day-side x-line (DXL). This study demonstrates that the global orientation of the DXL in GAMERA global MHD simulations varies on a time scale of minutes during steady southward interplanetary magnetic field conditions. This behavior manifests in observational data when reconnection outflows indicate that the direction to the x-line is opposite to the prediction from a steady-state model of the reconnection location. Because steady-state models of the DXL do not capture dynamics that are independent of solar wind variations, particularly surface waves and flux transfer events, they represent a time-averaged state of the system. </p
    corecore